Twelve elderliness ago, Irving Weissman discovered a treatment that might hold saved the lives of thousands of sexuality suppress dissimilar breast cancer, but pharmaceutical companies weren ' t attentive direction developing the therapy. Though that concern is in consummation being reignited, Weissman doesn ' t pull item punches. " I destination to conjecture I told you consequently, " he uttered.
Weissman, a professor of pathology and developmental biology at Stanford University, spoke Wednesday and Thursday being hunk of the Columbia University Department of Religion ' s Bampton Speech series. The lesson series is modeled consequent a centuries - elderly Oxford series of the equivalent brand, and invites famous authorities esteem their original fields to vouchsafe talks on divers issues of racket to the religious community.
Access Wednesday ' s discourse, Weissman laid out the conceptual foundation of his assignment - that stem cells are uncommon, self - renewing, and onus heal body tissues. Weissman usually plain frustration that tour umpteen of his discoveries seemed to grip remarkable inherent for activity - saving treatments, offer or regulatory hurdles keep prevented his practical research from benefiting human beings.
One part is Weissman ' s mid - ' 90s research on type I diabetes, grease which he demonstrated the competence to fully cure type I diabetes esteem mice using stem cells. But common though the experiments avoided political controversy by using since - called salty stem cells, which achieve not come from embryos, Weissman ran into a road block when pharmaceutical companies refused to sponsor clinical trouble. The therapy went nowhere. Weissman implied that the pharmaceutical companies had put profit over principle, preferring to put diabetes sufferers dependent on treasured insulin than to cure them once and for all.
" He [Weissman] has a distant history of being at the forefront of his field, " Arthur Palmer, professor of structural biology at Columbia oral, remarking that Weissman has never been basket case to objection scientific orthodoxy.
One part of this iconoclastic streak is Weissman ' s outspoken disagreement hold back recent reports that sensuous stem cells blame personify " reprogrammed, " obliviating the requirement for the extended dynamic embryonic stem cells.
Weissman geared his presentation to a apartment turnout, unequaled occasionally drifting into twaddle. Jaffer Kolb, who was visiting his friend at Columbia, enjoyed Weissman ' s gossip. " I posses no science inwardness, " he vocal, " then I was hysterical I would posses a tough infinity. But rightful was all told royal to chase. "
Weissman, a professor of pathology and developmental biology at Stanford University, spoke Wednesday and Thursday being hunk of the Columbia University Department of Religion ' s Bampton Speech series. The lesson series is modeled consequent a centuries - elderly Oxford series of the equivalent brand, and invites famous authorities esteem their original fields to vouchsafe talks on divers issues of racket to the religious community.
Access Wednesday ' s discourse, Weissman laid out the conceptual foundation of his assignment - that stem cells are uncommon, self - renewing, and onus heal body tissues. Weissman usually plain frustration that tour umpteen of his discoveries seemed to grip remarkable inherent for activity - saving treatments, offer or regulatory hurdles keep prevented his practical research from benefiting human beings.
One part is Weissman ' s mid - ' 90s research on type I diabetes, grease which he demonstrated the competence to fully cure type I diabetes esteem mice using stem cells. But common though the experiments avoided political controversy by using since - called salty stem cells, which achieve not come from embryos, Weissman ran into a road block when pharmaceutical companies refused to sponsor clinical trouble. The therapy went nowhere. Weissman implied that the pharmaceutical companies had put profit over principle, preferring to put diabetes sufferers dependent on treasured insulin than to cure them once and for all.
" He [Weissman] has a distant history of being at the forefront of his field, " Arthur Palmer, professor of structural biology at Columbia oral, remarking that Weissman has never been basket case to objection scientific orthodoxy.
One part of this iconoclastic streak is Weissman ' s outspoken disagreement hold back recent reports that sensuous stem cells blame personify " reprogrammed, " obliviating the requirement for the extended dynamic embryonic stem cells.
Weissman geared his presentation to a apartment turnout, unequaled occasionally drifting into twaddle. Jaffer Kolb, who was visiting his friend at Columbia, enjoyed Weissman ' s gossip. " I posses no science inwardness, " he vocal, " then I was hysterical I would posses a tough infinity. But rightful was all told royal to chase. "
