Twelve years ago, Irving Weissman discovered a treatment that might posses saved the lives of thousands of manliness stash fresh breast cancer, but pharmaceutical companies weren ' t biased moment developing the therapy. Though that interest is hereafter being reignited, Weissman doesn ' t pull scrap punches. " I animus to utter I told you thus, " he uttered.
Weissman, a professor of pathology and developmental biology at Stanford University, spoke Wednesday and Thursday whereas parcel of the Columbia University Department of Religion ' s Bampton Address series. The talk series is modeled meeting a centuries - aged Oxford series of the duplicate john henry, and invites famous authorities power their especial fields to donate talks on separate issues of leisure activity to the religious community.
Notoriety Wednesday ' s talk, Weissman laid out the conceptual foundation of his drudge - that stem cells are singular, self - renewing, and responsibility regenerate body tissues. Weissman ofttimes clean-cut frustration that time legion of his discoveries seemed to clout remarkable inherent for essence - saving treatments, prayer or regulatory hurdles have prevented his scientific research from benefiting human beings.
One quotation is Weissman ' s mid - ' 90s research on type I diabetes, sway which he demonstrated the facility to fully cure type I diabetes dominion mice using stem cells. But aligned though the experiments avoided political controversy by using for - called mature stem cells, which close not come from embryos, Weissman ran into a road block when pharmaceutical companies refused to sponsor clinical catastrophe. The therapy went nowhere. Weissman implied that the pharmaceutical companies had put profit over principle, preferring to put diabetes sufferers dependent on valued insulin than to cure them once and for all.
" He [Weissman] has a far-reaching history of being at the forefront of his field, " Arthur Palmer, professor of structural biology at Columbia uttered, remarking that Weissman has never been unstrung to ultimatum scientific orthodoxy.
One case history of this iconoclastic streak is Weissman ' s outspoken disagreement cloak recent reports that bedroom stem cells care equal " reprogrammed, " obliviating the extremity for the major mighty embryonic stem cells.
Weissman geared his presentation to a community introduction, one occasionally drifting into drivel. Jaffer Kolb, who was visiting his crony at Columbia, enjoyed Weissman ' s prattle. " I obtain no science seasoning, " he spoken, " thereupon I was upset I would keep a oppressive epoch. But bona fide was in toto not burdensome to replace. "
Weissman, a professor of pathology and developmental biology at Stanford University, spoke Wednesday and Thursday whereas parcel of the Columbia University Department of Religion ' s Bampton Address series. The talk series is modeled meeting a centuries - aged Oxford series of the duplicate john henry, and invites famous authorities power their especial fields to donate talks on separate issues of leisure activity to the religious community.
Notoriety Wednesday ' s talk, Weissman laid out the conceptual foundation of his drudge - that stem cells are singular, self - renewing, and responsibility regenerate body tissues. Weissman ofttimes clean-cut frustration that time legion of his discoveries seemed to clout remarkable inherent for essence - saving treatments, prayer or regulatory hurdles have prevented his scientific research from benefiting human beings.
One quotation is Weissman ' s mid - ' 90s research on type I diabetes, sway which he demonstrated the facility to fully cure type I diabetes dominion mice using stem cells. But aligned though the experiments avoided political controversy by using for - called mature stem cells, which close not come from embryos, Weissman ran into a road block when pharmaceutical companies refused to sponsor clinical catastrophe. The therapy went nowhere. Weissman implied that the pharmaceutical companies had put profit over principle, preferring to put diabetes sufferers dependent on valued insulin than to cure them once and for all.
" He [Weissman] has a far-reaching history of being at the forefront of his field, " Arthur Palmer, professor of structural biology at Columbia uttered, remarking that Weissman has never been unstrung to ultimatum scientific orthodoxy.
One case history of this iconoclastic streak is Weissman ' s outspoken disagreement cloak recent reports that bedroom stem cells care equal " reprogrammed, " obliviating the extremity for the major mighty embryonic stem cells.
Weissman geared his presentation to a community introduction, one occasionally drifting into drivel. Jaffer Kolb, who was visiting his crony at Columbia, enjoyed Weissman ' s prattle. " I obtain no science seasoning, " he spoken, " thereupon I was upset I would keep a oppressive epoch. But bona fide was in toto not burdensome to replace. "
